↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Selective computed tomography (CT) versus routine thoracoabdominal CT for high‐energy blunt‐trauma patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
Title
Selective computed tomography (CT) versus routine thoracoabdominal CT for high‐energy blunt‐trauma patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009743.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raoul Van Vugt, Frederik Keus, Digna Kool, Jaap Deunk, Michael Edwards

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 134 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Master 15 11%
Other 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 34 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Unspecified 4 3%
Psychology 2 1%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 39 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2017.
All research outputs
#2,485,955
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,021
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,681
of 321,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#109
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.