↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interim PET-results for prognosis in adults with Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 tweeters
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Interim PET-results for prognosis in adults with Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012643.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela Aldin, Lisa Umlauff, Lise J Estcourt, Gary Collins, Karel GM Moons, Andreas Engert, Carsten Kobe, Bastian von Tresckow, Madhuri Haque, Farid Foroutan, Nina Kreuzberger, Marialena Trivella, Nicole Skoetz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 18%
Student > Bachelor 15 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Other 7 8%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 29 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 34 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,612,074
of 18,666,194 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,886
of 11,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,604
of 404,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,666,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.