↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Motor neuroprosthesis for promoting recovery of function after stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
238 Mendeley
Title
Motor neuroprosthesis for promoting recovery of function after stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012991.pub2
Authors

Luciana A Mendes, Illia NDF Lima, Tulio Souza, George C do Nascimento, Vanessa R Resqueti, Guilherme AF Fregonezi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 238 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 18%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Researcher 23 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 7%
Student > Postgraduate 8 3%
Other 36 15%
Unknown 87 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 41 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 16%
Sports and Recreations 9 4%
Psychology 8 3%
Neuroscience 8 3%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 101 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2020.
All research outputs
#11,468,441
of 18,922,407 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,852
of 11,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,652
of 405,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,922,407 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.