| Title |
Interventions for renal vasculitis in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003232.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giles D Walters, Narelle S Willis, Tess E Cooper, Jonathan C Craig |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 14% |
| Argentina | 2 | 9% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
| Peru | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 14% |
| Scientists | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 276 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 9% |
| Other | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 17% |
| Unknown | 105 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 20 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 37 | 13% |
| Unknown | 108 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,694,361
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,643
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,339
of 476,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.