↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Consultation letters for medically unexplained physical symptoms in primary care

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
314 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Consultation letters for medically unexplained physical symptoms in primary care
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006524.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rob Hoedeman, Annette H Blankenstein, Christina M van der Feltz‐Cornelis, Boudien Krol, Roy Stewart, Johan W Groothoff

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 307 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 18%
Student > Bachelor 38 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 11%
Researcher 33 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 48 15%
Unknown 85 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 98 31%
Psychology 44 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 9%
Social Sciences 15 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 94 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2020.
All research outputs
#8,647,757
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,741
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,217
of 192,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.