↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Early versus delayed postoperative radiotherapy for treatment of low-grade gliomas

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
Title
Early versus delayed postoperative radiotherapy for treatment of low-grade gliomas
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009229.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sanjay Dhawan, Chirag G Patil, Clark Chen, Andrew S Venteicher

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 193 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 11%
Other 20 10%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Researcher 15 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 7%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 75 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Psychology 7 4%
Unspecified 6 3%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 77 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2020.
All research outputs
#5,832,280
of 23,189,371 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,711
of 12,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,025
of 456,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#127
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,189,371 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.