↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dissection versus diathermy for tonsillectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Dissection versus diathermy for tonsillectomy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002211.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Darren K Pinder, Helena Wilson, Malcolm P Hilton

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 139 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Other 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 38 27%
Unknown 39 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 42%
Psychology 9 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Unspecified 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 48 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2022.
All research outputs
#8,373,072
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,570
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,033
of 119,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.