↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dissection versus diathermy for tonsillectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Dissection versus diathermy for tonsillectomy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002211.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Darren K Pinder, Helena Wilson, Malcolm P Hilton

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 124 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 13%
Researcher 15 12%
Other 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 36 29%
Unknown 25 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 47%
Psychology 8 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Unspecified 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 35 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2022.
All research outputs
#6,760,005
of 21,542,809 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,547
of 12,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,270
of 369,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,542,809 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,070 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.