↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatments for adults with prominent lower front teeth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Treatments for adults with prominent lower front teeth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006963.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hideko Minami-Sugaya, Débora A Lentini-Oliveira, Fernando R Carvalho, Marco Antonio C Machado, Clóvis Marzola, Humberto Saconato, Gilmar F Prado

Abstract

Prominent lower front teeth may be associated with a large or prognathic lower jaw (mandible) or a small or retrusive upper jaw (maxilla). Edward Angle, who may be considered the father of modern orthodontics, classified the malocclusion in this situation as Class III. The individual is described as having a negative or reverse overjet as the lower front teeth are more prominent than the upper front teeth.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Unknown 56 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Postgraduate 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 3 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 61%
Psychology 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Materials Science 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 6 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2015.
All research outputs
#3,899,538
of 16,383,911 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,303
of 11,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,192
of 128,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,383,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.