↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001754.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucky Saraswat, Haroon Rehman, Muhammad Imran Omar, June D Cody, Patricia Aluko, Cathryn MA Glazener

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 105 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Researcher 11 10%
Other 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 25 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 15%
Sports and Recreations 4 4%
Psychology 3 3%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 27 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,088,404
of 17,824,880 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,795
of 11,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,323
of 338,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,824,880 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.