Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Lucky Saraswat, Haroon Rehman, Muhammad Imran Omar, June D Cody, Patricia Aluko, Cathryn MA Glazener
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||14||50%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||7||25%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||25||12%|
|Student > Master||20||10%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||12||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||56||27%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||25||12%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||5||2%|
|Sports and Recreations||5||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,292,134 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 12,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 459,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,292,134 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,880 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.