↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for chronic palmoplantar pustulosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for chronic palmoplantar pustulosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011628.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Grace Obeid, Giao Do, Lisa Kirby, Carolyn Hughes, Emilie Sbidian, Laurence Le Cleach

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 124 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 16%
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Researcher 10 8%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 40 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 41 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,607,749
of 19,188,609 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,774
of 11,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,620
of 350,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,188,609 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.