↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for chronic pruritus of unknown origin

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
375 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for chronic pruritus of unknown origin
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013128.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Andrade, Chii Yang Kuah, Juliana Esther Martin-Lopez, Shunjie Chua, Volha Shpadaruk, Gloria Sanclemente, Juan VA Franco

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 375 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 375 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 54 14%
Student > Master 43 11%
Other 25 7%
Researcher 25 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 6%
Other 61 16%
Unknown 146 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 94 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 8%
Psychology 23 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Other 51 14%
Unknown 155 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2022.
All research outputs
#5,692,710
of 23,323,574 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,609
of 12,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,968
of 452,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#115
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,323,574 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.