↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Nutritional support for liver disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 tweeters
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
434 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Nutritional support for liver disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008344.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ronald L Koretz, Alison Avenell, Timothy O Lipman

Abstract

Weight loss and muscle wasting are commonly found in patients with end-stage liver disease. Since there is an association between malnutrition and poor clinical outcome, such patients (or those at risk of becoming malnourished) are often given parenteral nutrition, enteral nutrition, or oral nutritional supplements. These interventions have costs and adverse effects, so it is important to prove that their use results in improved morbidity or mortality, or both.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 434 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 425 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 73 17%
Student > Bachelor 60 14%
Researcher 59 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 9%
Other 31 7%
Other 97 22%
Unknown 77 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 189 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 59 14%
Social Sciences 18 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 3%
Psychology 12 3%
Other 41 9%
Unknown 100 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,473,657
of 22,461,871 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,393
of 12,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,168
of 144,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,461,871 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.