↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Anti-leukotriene agents compared to inhaled corticosteroids in the management of recurrent and/or chronic asthma in adults and children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
163 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
348 Mendeley
Title
Anti-leukotriene agents compared to inhaled corticosteroids in the management of recurrent and/or chronic asthma in adults and children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002314.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bhupendrasinh F Chauhan, Francine M Ducharme

Abstract

Anti-leukotrienes (5-lipoxygenase inhibitors and leukotriene receptors antagonists) serve as alternative monotherapy to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in the management of recurrent and/or chronic asthma in adults and children.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 348 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 345 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 55 16%
Student > Bachelor 40 11%
Researcher 37 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 9%
Other 18 5%
Other 72 21%
Unknown 94 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 128 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 5%
Psychology 14 4%
Unspecified 11 3%
Other 43 12%
Unknown 107 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,888,626
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,191
of 12,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,973
of 164,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.