↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Anti-leukotriene agents compared to inhaled corticosteroids in the management of recurrent and/or chronic asthma in adults and children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
Title
Anti-leukotriene agents compared to inhaled corticosteroids in the management of recurrent and/or chronic asthma in adults and children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002314.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bhupendrasinh F Chauhan, Francine M Ducharme

Abstract

Anti-leukotrienes (5-lipoxygenase inhibitors and leukotriene receptors antagonists) serve as alternative monotherapy to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in the management of recurrent and/or chronic asthma in adults and children.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 259 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 20%
Student > Bachelor 35 13%
Researcher 34 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 11%
Other 17 6%
Other 52 20%
Unknown 42 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 120 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 5%
Psychology 11 4%
Social Sciences 10 4%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 51 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2017.
All research outputs
#1,662,994
of 17,361,274 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,117
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,664
of 133,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,361,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.