The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Intravenous immunoglobulins for epilepsy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008557.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
JinSong Geng, JianCheng Dong, Youping Li, HengJian Ni, Kui Jiang, Li Li Shi, GuoHua Wang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 95 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 15% |
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 30 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 5% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 33 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2020.
All research outputs
#5,042,943
of 26,178,577 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,250
of 13,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,470
of 482,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#120
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,178,577 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.