↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intravenous immunoglobulins for epilepsy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Intravenous immunoglobulins for epilepsy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008557.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

JinSong Geng, JianCheng Dong, Youping Li, HengJian Ni, Kui Jiang, Li Li Shi, GuoHua Wang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 93 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 15%
Researcher 11 12%
Other 7 7%
Unspecified 7 7%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 27 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 27%
Unspecified 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 30 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,839,027
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,959
of 11,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,082
of 473,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#117
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.