↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatment for ascites in adults with decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
Title
Treatment for ascites in adults with decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013123.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amine Benmassaoud, Suzanne C Freeman, Davide Roccarina, Maria Corina Plaz Torres, Alex J Sutton, Nicola J Cooper, Laura Iogna Prat, Maxine Cowlin, Elisabeth Jane Milne, Neil Hawkins, Brian R Davidson, Chavdar S Pavlov, Douglas Thorburn, Emmanuel Tsochatzis, Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 154 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 11%
Other 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 4%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 65 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Unspecified 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 71 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2021.
All research outputs
#14,472,378
of 23,191,112 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,482
of 12,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,809
of 456,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#159
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,191,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.