↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatment for ascites in adults with decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta‐analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
Title
Treatment for ascites in adults with decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta‐analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013123.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amine Benmassaoud, Suzanne C Freeman, Davide Roccarina, Maria Corina Plaz Torres, Alex J Sutton, Nicola J Cooper, Laura Iogna Prat, Maxine Cowlin, Elisabeth Jane Milne, Neil Hawkins, Brian R Davidson, Chavdar S Pavlov, Douglas Thorburn, Emmanuel Tsochatzis, Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 169 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 18 11%
Student > Master 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 4%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 79 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 85 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2021.
All research outputs
#16,108,994
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,826
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,745
of 477,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#137
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.