The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Interventions for smoking cessation in hospitalised patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001837.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nancy A Rigotti, Carole Clair, Marcus R Munafò, Lindsay F Stead |
| Abstract |
Smoking contributes to reasons for hospitalisation, and the period of hospitalisation may be a good time to provide help with quitting. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 419 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 406 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 66 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 63 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 8% |
| Other | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 77 | 18% |
| Unknown | 117 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 139 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 51 | 12% |
| Psychology | 29 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 38 | 9% |
| Unknown | 133 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,184,272
of 26,316,305 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,283
of 13,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,070
of 178,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,316,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.