↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for smoking cessation in hospitalised patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
347 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
371 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for smoking cessation in hospitalised patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001837.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nancy A Rigotti, Carole Clair, Marcus R Munafò, Lindsay F Stead

Abstract

Smoking contributes to reasons for hospitalisation, and the period of hospitalisation may be a good time to provide help with quitting.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 371 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
United States 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 356 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 66 18%
Student > Master 63 17%
Student > Bachelor 35 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 8%
Other 81 22%
Unknown 62 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 148 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 11%
Psychology 35 9%
Social Sciences 19 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 3%
Other 36 10%
Unknown 80 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#758,878
of 17,362,547 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,957
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,592
of 133,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,362,547 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.