↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for smoking cessation in hospitalised patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
414 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
442 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for smoking cessation in hospitalised patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001837.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nancy A Rigotti, Carole Clair, Marcus R Munafò, Lindsay F Stead

Abstract

Smoking contributes to reasons for hospitalisation, and the period of hospitalisation may be a good time to provide help with quitting.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 442 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 427 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 73 17%
Student > Master 73 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 8%
Student > Bachelor 37 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 7%
Other 88 20%
Unknown 102 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 157 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 50 11%
Psychology 36 8%
Social Sciences 19 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 4%
Other 41 9%
Unknown 121 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,127,225
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,573
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,537
of 163,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.