↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cognitive‐behavioural interventions for children who have been sexually abused

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
433 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Cognitive‐behavioural interventions for children who have been sexually abused
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001930.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geraldine Macdonald, Julian PT Higgins, Paul Ramchandani, Jeffrey C Valentine, Latricia P Bronger, Paul Klein, Roland O'Daniel, Mark Pickering, Ben Rademaker, George Richardson, Matthew Taylor

Abstract

Despite differences in how it is defined, there is a general consensus amongst clinicians and researchers that the sexual abuse of children and adolescents ('child sexual abuse') is a substantial social problem worldwide. The effects of sexual abuse manifest in a wide range of symptoms, including fear, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder and various externalising and internalising behaviour problems, such as inappropriate sexual behaviours. Child sexual abuse is associated with increased risk of psychological problems in adulthood. Cognitive-behavioural approaches are used to help children and their non-offending or 'safe' parent to manage the sequelae of childhood sexual abuse. This review updates the first Cochrane review of cognitive-behavioural approaches interventions for children who have been sexually abused, which was first published in 2006.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 433 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 429 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 14%
Student > Bachelor 50 12%
Researcher 43 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 6%
Other 59 14%
Unknown 152 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 84 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 79 18%
Social Sciences 35 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 8%
Neuroscience 7 2%
Other 29 7%
Unknown 165 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,885,612
of 25,383,278 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,091
of 12,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,831
of 171,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.