↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

First-line combination therapy versus first-line monotherapy for primary hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
34 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
Title
First-line combination therapy versus first-line monotherapy for primary hypertension
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010316.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Javier Garjón, Luis Carlos Saiz, Ana Azparren, Idoia Gaminde, Mª José Ariz, Juan Erviti

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 131 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 18%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 46 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 50 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,142,317
of 18,738,748 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,861
of 11,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,311
of 347,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,738,748 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.