↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

First-line combination therapy versus first-line monotherapy for primary hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
107 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
Title
First-line combination therapy versus first-line monotherapy for primary hypertension
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010316.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Javier Garjón, Luis Carlos Saiz, Ana Azparren, Idoia Gaminde, Mª José Ariz, Juan Erviti

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 107 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 202 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Researcher 16 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 83 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 5%
Unspecified 6 3%
Psychology 5 2%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 90 45%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2023.
All research outputs
#582,668
of 23,680,154 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,133
of 12,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,290
of 452,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,680,154 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.