↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

First-line combination therapy versus first-line monotherapy for primary hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
103 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
Title
First-line combination therapy versus first-line monotherapy for primary hypertension
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010316.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Javier Garjón, Luis Carlos Saiz, Ana Azparren, Idoia Gaminde, Mª José Ariz, Juan Erviti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 103 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 220 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Researcher 18 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 97 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 5%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Psychology 5 2%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 106 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2023.
All research outputs
#638,591
of 24,486,486 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,213
of 12,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,231
of 459,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,486,486 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.