↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Different infusion durations for preventing platinum-induced hearing loss in children with cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Different infusion durations for preventing platinum-induced hearing loss in children with cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010885.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jorrit W van As, Henk van den Berg, Elvira C van Dalen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 19%
Other 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Librarian 3 4%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 28 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 29 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,789,234
of 21,604,458 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,279
of 12,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,356
of 369,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,604,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.