↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Acupuncture for glaucoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
Title
Acupuncture for glaucoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006030.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon K Law, Lin Wang, Tianjing Li

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 98 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Student > Master 14 14%
Other 12 12%
Researcher 10 10%
Librarian 7 7%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 26 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 13%
Computer Science 4 4%
Psychology 3 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 29 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,514,058
of 17,809,310 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,142
of 11,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,969
of 338,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,809,310 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.