↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Acupuncture for glaucoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
Title
Acupuncture for glaucoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006030.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon K Law, Lin Wang, Tianjing Li

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 176 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Student > Master 20 11%
Other 16 9%
Researcher 12 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 6%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 67 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 11%
Unspecified 6 3%
Psychology 6 3%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 76 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,601,353
of 22,257,736 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,105
of 12,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,731
of 375,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,257,736 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.