↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Percutaneous pinning for treating distal radial fractures in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
Title
Percutaneous pinning for treating distal radial fractures in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006080.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexia Karantana, Helen HG Handoll, Ammar Sabouni

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 164 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Other 14 8%
Researcher 13 8%
Student > Postgraduate 12 7%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 53 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Psychology 6 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 55 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,438,713
of 18,999,792 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,524
of 11,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,193
of 352,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,999,792 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.