↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tonsillectomy for periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and cervical adenitis syndrome (PFAPA)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
Title
Tonsillectomy for periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and cervical adenitis syndrome (PFAPA)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008669.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin J Burton, Andrew J Pollard, James D Ramsden, Lee-Yee Chong, Roderick P Venekamp

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 191 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Other 19 10%
Researcher 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Student > Master 16 8%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 71 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Psychology 4 2%
Chemistry 2 1%
Decision Sciences 2 1%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 82 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,123,419
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,889
of 13,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,658
of 477,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#103
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.