↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tonsillectomy for periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and cervical adenitis syndrome (PFAPA)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
Tonsillectomy for periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and cervical adenitis syndrome (PFAPA)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008669.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin J Burton, Andrew J Pollard, James D Ramsden, Lee-Yee Chong, Roderick P Venekamp

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Master 14 13%
Researcher 12 11%
Other 9 8%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 22 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 12%
Psychology 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 27 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,697,926
of 17,635,820 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,151
of 11,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,486
of 340,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,635,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,724 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.