↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chinese herbal medicine for advanced pancreatic cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Chinese herbal medicine for advanced pancreatic cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009809
Authors

Xun Li, Yi Hu Ni, Yun Xu, Jian Ping Liu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 25%
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Other 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 67%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 25%
Psychology 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2018.
All research outputs
#15,681,750
of 26,151,587 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,962
of 13,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,830
of 177,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#146
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,151,587 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.