↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Regular (ICSI) versus ultra-high magnification (IMSI) sperm selection for assisted reproduction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
Regular (ICSI) versus ultra-high magnification (IMSI) sperm selection for assisted reproduction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010167.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danielle M Teixeira, Andre H Miyague, Mariana AP Barbosa, Paula A Navarro, Nick Raine-Fenning, Carolina O Nastri, Wellington P Martins

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 120 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 17%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Researcher 14 12%
Other 12 10%
Unspecified 8 7%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 29 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 11%
Unspecified 10 8%
Engineering 7 6%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 34 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2021.
All research outputs
#4,122,788
of 20,585,915 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,678
of 12,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,542
of 280,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,585,915 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,082 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.