The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Cognitive training interventions for dementia and mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011961.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vasiliki Orgeta, Kathryn R McDonald, Ellen Poliakoff, John Vincent Hindle, Linda Clare, Iracema Leroi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 22% |
| Australia | 2 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 67% |
| Scientists | 4 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 541 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 541 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 54 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 9% |
| Researcher | 31 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 62 | 11% |
| Unknown | 266 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 81 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 7% |
| Psychology | 37 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 24 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 18 | 3% |
| Other | 58 | 11% |
| Unknown | 283 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,785,307
of 26,338,415 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,636
of 13,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,912
of 386,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,338,415 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.