↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for increasing acceptance of local anaesthetic in children and adolescents having dental treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
27 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for increasing acceptance of local anaesthetic in children and adolescents having dental treatment
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011024.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joana Monteiro, Ajit Tanday, Paul F Ashley, Susan Parekh, Hamdan Alamri

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 142 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 15%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Other 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 45 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 29%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Psychology 7 5%
Sports and Recreations 4 3%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 47 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2021.
All research outputs
#896,083
of 17,894,186 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,295
of 11,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,249
of 268,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,894,186 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.