| Title |
Advance care planning for adults with heart failure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013022.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuri Nishikawa, Natsuko Hiroyama, Hiroki Fukahori, Erika Ota, Atsushi Mizuno, Mitsunori Miyashita, Daisuke Yoneoka, Joey Sw Kwong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 11 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 13% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Central African Republic | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 87% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 8% |
| Scientists | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 231 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 7% |
| Researcher | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 14% |
| Unknown | 111 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 8% |
| Psychology | 10 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 114 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,405,483
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,961
of 13,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,661
of 386,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.