↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Advance care planning for adults with heart failure

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
39 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
Title
Advance care planning for adults with heart failure
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013022.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuri Nishikawa, Natsuko Hiroyama, Hiroki Fukahori, Erika Ota, Atsushi Mizuno, Mitsunori Miyashita, Daisuke Yoneoka, Joey SW Kwong

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 145 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 55 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Psychology 10 7%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 60 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,110,129
of 21,339,393 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,623
of 12,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,625
of 283,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,339,393 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.