Title |
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000451.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elaine M Finucane, Deirdre J Murphy, Linda M Biesty, Gillian Ml Gyte, Amanda M Cotter, Ethel M Ryan, Michel Boulvain, Declan Devane |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 14% |
Japan | 2 | 7% |
Denmark | 1 | 4% |
France | 1 | 4% |
Ireland | 1 | 4% |
Kyrgyzstan | 1 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 16 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 22 | 79% |
Scientists | 3 | 11% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 326 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 53 | 16% |
Student > Master | 42 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 6% |
Researcher | 17 | 5% |
Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 5% |
Other | 46 | 14% |
Unknown | 134 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 91 | 28% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 56 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 1% |
Other | 30 | 9% |
Unknown | 134 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,319,202
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,812
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,979
of 384,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.