↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Membrane sweeping for induction of labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
26 tweeters
facebook
9 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
Title
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000451.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elaine M Finucane, Deirdre J Murphy, Linda M Biesty, Gillian ML Gyte, Amanda M Cotter, Ethel M Ryan, Michel Boulvain, Declan Devane

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 130 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 21%
Student > Bachelor 22 17%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 28 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 29 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2020.
All research outputs
#869,511
of 17,457,801 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,271
of 11,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,030
of 266,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,457,801 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.