↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Membrane sweeping for induction of labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
29 tweeters
facebook
11 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
248 Mendeley
Title
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000451.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elaine M Finucane, Deirdre J Murphy, Linda M Biesty, Gillian ML Gyte, Amanda M Cotter, Ethel M Ryan, Michel Boulvain, Declan Devane

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 247 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 48 19%
Student > Master 38 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Researcher 14 6%
Student > Postgraduate 12 5%
Other 40 16%
Unknown 80 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 45 18%
Unspecified 8 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 29 12%
Unknown 82 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,068,467
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,399
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,250
of 358,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#34
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.