↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Membrane sweeping for induction of labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
29 X users
facebook
11 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
333 Mendeley
Title
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000451.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elaine M Finucane, Deirdre J Murphy, Linda M Biesty, Gillian Ml Gyte, Amanda M Cotter, Ethel M Ryan, Michel Boulvain, Declan Devane

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 332 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 53 16%
Student > Master 42 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 6%
Unspecified 18 5%
Researcher 17 5%
Other 61 18%
Unknown 123 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 57 17%
Unspecified 18 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 33 10%
Unknown 124 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,284,872
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,723
of 11,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,460
of 383,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.