↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Green tea (Camellia sinensis) for the prevention of cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
49 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
297 Mendeley
Title
Green tea (Camellia sinensis) for the prevention of cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005004.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tommaso Filippini, Marcella Malavolti, Francesca Borrelli, Angelo A Izzo, Susan J Fairweather-Tait, Markus Horneber, Marco Vinceti

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Unknown 294 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 48 16%
Student > Master 45 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 7%
Researcher 17 6%
Student > Postgraduate 16 5%
Other 63 21%
Unknown 87 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 4%
Other 49 16%
Unknown 102 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2022.
All research outputs
#358,431
of 21,639,423 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#674
of 12,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,348
of 284,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,639,423 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.