↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Green tea (Camellia sinensis) for the prevention of cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
36 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
Title
Green tea (Camellia sinensis) for the prevention of cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005004.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tommaso Filippini, Marcella Malavolti, Francesca Borrelli, Angelo A Izzo, Susan J Fairweather-Tait, Markus Horneber, Marco Vinceti

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
Finland 1 <1%
Unknown 191 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 19%
Student > Bachelor 30 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Other 39 20%
Unknown 46 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 53 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2021.
All research outputs
#654,005
of 17,717,881 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,625
of 11,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,978
of 268,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,717,881 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.