The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Green tea (Camellia sinensis) for the prevention of cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005004.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tommaso Filippini, Marcella Malavolti, Francesca Borrelli, Angelo A Izzo, Susan J Fairweather-Tait, Markus Horneber, Marco Vinceti |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| India | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 33 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 20% |
| Scientists | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 496 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 493 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 61 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 61 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 7% |
| Researcher | 25 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 4% |
| Other | 79 | 16% |
| Unknown | 215 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 20 | 4% |
| Other | 58 | 12% |
| Unknown | 238 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 159. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2024.
All research outputs
#272,277
of 26,372,509 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#437
of 13,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,465
of 387,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,372,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.