| Title |
Structural magnetic resonance imaging for the early diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease in people with mild cognitive impairment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009628.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gemma Lombardi, Giada Crescioli, Enrica Cavedo, Ersilia Lucenteforte, Giovanni Casazza, Alessandro-Giacco Bellatorre, Chiara Lista, Giorgio Costantino, Giovanni Frisoni, Gianni Virgili, Graziella Filippini |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 15% |
| Chile | 2 | 6% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 3% |
| Comoros | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 91% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 309 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 11% |
| Researcher | 22 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 37 | 12% |
| Unknown | 139 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 23% |
| Neuroscience | 19 | 6% |
| Psychology | 16 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 4% |
| Engineering | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 29 | 9% |
| Unknown | 156 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2021.
All research outputs
#964,713
of 23,884,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,051
of 12,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,019
of 363,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,884,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.