↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain management in sickle cell disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
Title
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain management in sickle cell disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012762.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sudipta Pal, Ruchita Dixit, Soe Moe, Myron Anthony Godinho, Adinegara Bl Abas, Samir K Ballas, Shanker Ram, Uduman Ali M Yousuf

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 235 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Researcher 15 6%
Other 13 6%
Other 32 14%
Unknown 109 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 12%
Psychology 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Sports and Recreations 4 2%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 122 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2020.
All research outputs
#6,965,763
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,571
of 13,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,648
of 385,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#118
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,113 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.