↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain management in sickle cell disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
Title
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain management in sickle cell disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012762.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sudipta Pal, Ruchita Dixit, Soe Moe, Myron Anthony Godinho, Adinegara BL Abas, Samir K Ballas, Shanker Ram, Uduman Ali M Yousuf

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 160 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 61 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 13%
Psychology 5 3%
Unspecified 4 2%
Sports and Recreations 3 2%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 71 44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2020.
All research outputs
#5,127,764
of 19,430,502 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,312
of 11,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,450
of 276,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,430,502 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,930 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.