↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain management in sickle cell disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
Title
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain management in sickle cell disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012762.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sudipta Pal, Ruchita Dixit, Soe Moe, Myron Anthony Godinho, Adinegara BL Abas, Samir K Ballas, Shanker Ram, Uduman Ali M Yousuf

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 236 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Researcher 15 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 102 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 13%
Psychology 9 4%
Unspecified 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 115 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2020.
All research outputs
#6,163,554
of 23,197,711 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,959
of 12,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,579
of 360,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#119
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,197,711 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.