↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Immunosuppressive agents for treating IgA nephropathy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
28 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
Title
Immunosuppressive agents for treating IgA nephropathy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003965.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrizia Natale, Suetonia C Palmer, Marinella Ruospo, Valeria M Saglimbene, Jonathan C Craig, Mariacristina Vecchio, Joshua A Samuels, Donald A Molony, Francesco Paolo Schena, Giovanni Fm Strippoli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 234 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Other 20 9%
Student > Postgraduate 15 6%
Researcher 14 6%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 97 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 104 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,669,900
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,597
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,115
of 389,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.