↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pharmacological interventions for preventing clotting of extracorporeal circuits during continuous renal replacement therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacological interventions for preventing clotting of extracorporeal circuits during continuous renal replacement therapy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012467.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiraku Tsujimoto, Yasushi Tsujimoto, Yukihiko Nakata, Tomoko Fujii, Sei Takahashi, Mai Akazawa, Yuki Kataoka

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 18%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 13 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,339,911
of 21,728,137 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,824
of 12,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,090
of 338,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,728,137 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.