↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Inhaled versus systemic corticosteroids for preventing chronic lung disease in ventilated very low birth weight preterm neonates.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Inhaled versus systemic corticosteroids for preventing chronic lung disease in ventilated very low birth weight preterm neonates.
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002058.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shah SS, Ohlsson A, Halliday HL, Shah VS

Abstract

Chronic lung disease (CLD) remains an important cause of mortality and morbidity in preterm infants and inflammation plays an important role in its pathogenesis. The use of inhaled corticosteroids may modulate the inflammatory process without concomitant high systemic steroid concentrations and less risk of adverse effects.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
Unknown 93 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 20%
Researcher 13 14%
Other 11 12%
Student > Postgraduate 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Other 23 24%
Unknown 8 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 68%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Psychology 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 11 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2012.
All research outputs
#1,099,421
of 13,190,464 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,387
of 10,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,915
of 120,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,190,464 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,519 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.