↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013559
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharlotta Cote, Alexis Ceecee Zhang, Victoria Ahmadzai, Amina Maleken, Christine Li, Jeremy Oppedisano, Kaavya Nair, Ljoudmila Busija, Laura E Downie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Other 8 9%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 28 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Psychology 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 34 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2020.
All research outputs
#3,410,088
of 17,379,776 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,096
of 11,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,410
of 272,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,379,776 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.