↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychological interventions for people with hemophilia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
Title
Psychological interventions for people with hemophilia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010215.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Palareti, Giannino Melotti, Frederica Cassis, Sarah J Nevitt, Alfonso Iorio

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 226 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 17%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 41 18%
Unknown 65 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 40 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 10%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Unspecified 11 5%
Other 40 18%
Unknown 71 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2020.
All research outputs
#9,544,768
of 17,464,602 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,134
of 11,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,717
of 276,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,464,602 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.