↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Repeat digital cervical assessment in pregnancy for identifying women at risk of preterm labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
8 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Repeat digital cervical assessment in pregnancy for identifying women at risk of preterm labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005940.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophie Alexander, Michel Boulvain, Gilles Ceysens, Edwige Haelterman, Wei-Hong Zhang

Abstract

Repeat digital cervical assessment (RDCA - examination of the cervix with a finger) has been promoted as a routine intervention in the antenatal clinic as a screening test for the risk of preterm birth (that is, birth occurring before 37 weeks of gestation).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Ireland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 109 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 16%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Other 6 5%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 20 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 45%
Social Sciences 12 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Psychology 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 23 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,905,669
of 17,494,559 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,392
of 11,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,337
of 133,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#56
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,494,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.