↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Repeat digital cervical assessment in pregnancy for identifying women at risk of preterm labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Repeat digital cervical assessment in pregnancy for identifying women at risk of preterm labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005940.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophie Alexander, Michel Boulvain, Gilles Ceysens, Edwige Haelterman, Wei‐Hong Zhang

Abstract

Repeat digital cervical assessment (RDCA - examination of the cervix with a finger) has been promoted as a routine intervention in the antenatal clinic as a screening test for the risk of preterm birth (that is, birth occurring before 37 weeks of gestation).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
France 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 154 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 14%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Other 6 4%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 51 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 37%
Social Sciences 12 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Engineering 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 53 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,158,559
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,320
of 13,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,900
of 98,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.