The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Repeat digital cervical assessment in pregnancy for identifying women at risk of preterm labour
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005940.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sophie Alexander, Michel Boulvain, Gilles Ceysens, Edwige Haelterman, Wei‐Hong Zhang |
| Abstract |
Repeat digital cervical assessment (RDCA - examination of the cervix with a finger) has been promoted as a routine intervention in the antenatal clinic as a screening test for the risk of preterm birth (that is, birth occurring before 37 weeks of gestation). |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 163 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 14% |
| Researcher | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 16% |
| Unknown | 59 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 7% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 61 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,158,559
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,320
of 13,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,900
of 98,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.