↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000475.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gaity Ahmad, Kyungmin Kim, Matthew Thompson, Priya Agarwal, Helena O'Flynn, Akshay Hindocha, Andrew Watson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 23%
Other 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 19 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Psychology 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 20 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,813,749
of 17,379,776 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,457
of 11,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,380
of 276,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,379,776 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.