↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
Title
Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000475.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gaity Ahmad, Kyungmin Kim, Matthew Thompson, Priya Agarwal, Helena O'Flynn, Akshay Hindocha, Andrew Watson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 124 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Other 11 9%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 42 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 47 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,223,856
of 19,798,657 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,811
of 11,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,572
of 286,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,798,657 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.