The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000475.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gaity Ahmad, Kyungmin Kim, Matthew Thompson, Priya Agarwal, Helena O'Flynn, Akshay Hindocha, Andrew Watson |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 198 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
| Researcher | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 13% |
| Unknown | 94 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 100 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,557,364
of 26,245,314 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,901
of 13,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,480
of 395,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#103
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,245,314 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.