↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Calcitonin testing for detection of medullary thyroid cancer in people with thyroid nodules

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
Title
Calcitonin testing for detection of medullary thyroid cancer in people with thyroid nodules
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010159.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hans Hg Verbeek, Jan Willem B de Groot, Wim J Sluiter, Anneke C Muller Kobold, Edwin R van den Heuvel, John Tm Plukker, Thera P Links

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 132 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Master 11 8%
Other 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 67 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Unspecified 4 3%
Decision Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 72 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,994,699
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,052
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,703
of 392,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#115
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.