| Title |
Physical fitness training for stroke patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003316.pub7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David H Saunders, Mark Sanderson, Sara Hayes, Liam Johnson, Sharon Kramer, Daniel D Carter, Hannah Jarvis, Miriam Brazzelli, Gillian E Mead |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 87 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 22% |
| Australia | 9 | 10% |
| Spain | 5 | 6% |
| Ireland | 4 | 5% |
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 2% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 30 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 60 | 69% |
| Scientists | 18 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,008 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1001 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 127 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 120 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 6% |
| Researcher | 58 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 43 | 4% |
| Other | 159 | 16% |
| Unknown | 439 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 157 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 138 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 84 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 41 | 4% |
| Psychology | 20 | 2% |
| Other | 100 | 10% |
| Unknown | 468 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2023.
All research outputs
#588,468
of 24,578,676 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,098
of 12,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,530
of 370,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,578,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.