↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Physical fitness training for stroke patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
91 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
843 Mendeley
Title
Physical fitness training for stroke patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003316.pub7
Pubmed ID
Authors

David H Saunders, Mark Sanderson, Sara Hayes, Liam Johnson, Sharon Kramer, Daniel D Carter, Hannah Jarvis, Miriam Brazzelli, Gillian E Mead

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 91 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 843 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 836 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 116 14%
Student > Master 113 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 7%
Researcher 53 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 51 6%
Other 146 17%
Unknown 307 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 158 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 118 14%
Sports and Recreations 76 9%
Neuroscience 39 5%
Psychology 22 3%
Other 98 12%
Unknown 332 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2022.
All research outputs
#493,250
of 22,459,507 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#954
of 12,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,774
of 295,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,459,507 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.