↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Physical fitness training for stroke patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
78 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
528 Mendeley
Title
Physical fitness training for stroke patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003316.pub7
Pubmed ID
Authors

David H Saunders, Mark Sanderson, Sara Hayes, Liam Johnson, Sharon Kramer, Daniel D Carter, Hannah Jarvis, Miriam Brazzelli, Gillian E Mead

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 528 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 521 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 84 16%
Student > Bachelor 69 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 50 9%
Researcher 40 8%
Other 115 22%
Unknown 117 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 124 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 85 16%
Sports and Recreations 67 13%
Neuroscience 27 5%
Unspecified 15 3%
Other 75 14%
Unknown 135 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2020.
All research outputs
#407,155
of 17,601,811 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#901
of 11,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,893
of 277,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,601,811 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.