↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in the elderly: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in the elderly: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013261.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine Hanna, Theresa A Lawrie, Ewelina Rogozińska, Ashleigh Kernohan, Sarah Jefferies, Helen Bulbeck, Usama M Ali, Tomos Robinson, Robin Grant

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 119 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 18%
Student > Master 17 14%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 32 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 36 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,423,392
of 17,566,999 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,131
of 11,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,867
of 277,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,566,999 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,713 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.