The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Enteral lactoferrin supplementation for prevention of sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007137.pub6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mohan Pammi, Gautham Suresh |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 15% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 75% |
| Scientists | 3 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 315 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 315 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 54 | 17% |
| Unknown | 132 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 90 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 38 | 12% |
| Unknown | 148 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,420,677
of 25,528,120 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,979
of 13,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,378
of 397,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#81
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,528,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.