↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hospital at home for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
286 Mendeley
Title
Hospital at home for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003573.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elisabeth Jeppesen, Kjetil G Brurberg, Gunn E Vist, Jadwiga A Wedzicha, John J Wright, Michael Greenstone, Julia AE Walters

Abstract

Hospital at home schemes are a recently adopted method of service delivery for the management of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) aimed at reducing demand for acute hospital inpatient beds and promoting a patient-centred approach through admission avoidance. However, evidence in support of such a service is contradictory.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 279 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 17%
Student > Bachelor 34 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 10%
Researcher 27 9%
Student > Postgraduate 21 7%
Other 62 22%
Unknown 63 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 15%
Psychology 14 5%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Computer Science 9 3%
Other 33 12%
Unknown 74 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,247,520
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,638
of 11,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,491
of 176,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.