| Title |
Hospital at home for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003573.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elisabeth Jeppesen, Kjetil G Brurberg, Gunn E Vist, Jadwiga A Wedzicha, John J Wright, Michael Greenstone, Julia AE Walters |
| Abstract |
Hospital at home schemes are a recently adopted method of service delivery for the management of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) aimed at reducing demand for acute hospital inpatient beds and promoting a patient-centred approach through admission avoidance. However, evidence in support of such a service is contradictory. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 40% |
| Brazil | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 276 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 49 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 10% |
| Researcher | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 62 | 22% |
| Unknown | 61 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 102 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 16% |
| Psychology | 14 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 32 | 11% |
| Unknown | 72 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,914,129
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,227
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,331
of 163,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.