↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Educational, supportive and behavioural interventions to improve usage of continuous positive airway pressure machines in adults with obstructive sleep apnoea

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
Title
Educational, supportive and behavioural interventions to improve usage of continuous positive airway pressure machines in adults with obstructive sleep apnoea
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007736.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathleen Askland, Lauren Wright, Dariusz R Wozniak, Talia Emmanuel, Jessica Caston, Ian Smith

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 170 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Student > Postgraduate 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Other 15 9%
Other 46 26%
Unknown 35 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 15%
Psychology 14 8%
Unspecified 6 3%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 38 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,644,870
of 17,154,907 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,120
of 11,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,964
of 277,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,154,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.