↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Educational, supportive and behavioural interventions to improve usage of continuous positive airway pressure machines in adults with obstructive sleep apnoea

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
303 Mendeley
Title
Educational, supportive and behavioural interventions to improve usage of continuous positive airway pressure machines in adults with obstructive sleep apnoea
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007736.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathleen Askland, Lauren Wright, Dariusz R Wozniak, Talia Emmanuel, Jessica Caston, Ian Smith

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 300 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 14%
Student > Bachelor 30 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 10%
Researcher 26 9%
Other 22 7%
Other 56 18%
Unknown 98 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 12%
Psychology 24 8%
Neuroscience 10 3%
Unspecified 9 3%
Other 37 12%
Unknown 106 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,776,015
of 21,836,385 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,034
of 12,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,873
of 296,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,836,385 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.