↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antimetabolites as an adjunct to dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
Antimetabolites as an adjunct to dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012309.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul O Phelps, Samuel A Abariga, Benjamin J Cowling, Dinesh Selva, Marcus M Marcet

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 117 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 43 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Unspecified 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 45 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2022.
All research outputs
#5,471,968
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,459
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,678
of 400,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#116
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.