↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychological interventions for symptomatic management of non-specific chest pain in patients with normal coronary anatomy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Psychological interventions for symptomatic management of non-specific chest pain in patients with normal coronary anatomy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004101.pub4
Pubmed ID
Abstract

Recurrent chest pain in the absence of coronary artery disease is a common problem that sometimes leads to excess use of medical care. Although many studies examine the causes of pain in these patients, few clinical trials have evaluated treatment. The studies reviewed in this paper provide an insight into the effectiveness of psychological interventions for this group of patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Student > Master 6 18%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 33%
Psychology 7 21%
Linguistics 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 9 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2012.
All research outputs
#18,308,895
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,413
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,945
of 244,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#206
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.