↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Taxation of unprocessed sugar or sugar-added foods for reducing their consumption and preventing obesity or other adverse health outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
58 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
337 Mendeley
Title
Taxation of unprocessed sugar or sugar-added foods for reducing their consumption and preventing obesity or other adverse health outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012333.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manuela Pfinder, Thomas L Heise, Michele Hilton Boon, Frank Pega, Candida Fenton, Ursula Griebler, Gerald Gartlehner, Isolde Sommer, Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi, Stefan K Lhachimi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 337 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 337 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 15%
Student > Bachelor 44 13%
Researcher 37 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 7%
Other 18 5%
Other 41 12%
Unknown 121 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 50 15%
Psychology 16 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 3%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Other 44 13%
Unknown 140 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2022.
All research outputs
#580,016
of 22,617,693 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,149
of 12,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,113
of 298,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,617,693 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.