↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a mechanical microkeratome compared to LASIK with a femtosecond laser for LASIK in adults with myopia or myopic astigmatism

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a mechanical microkeratome compared to LASIK with a femtosecond laser for LASIK in adults with myopia or myopic astigmatism
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012946.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolás Kahuam-López, Alejandro Navas, Carlos Castillo-Salgado, Enrique O Graue-Hernandez, Aida Jimenez-Corona, Antonio Ibarra

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Student > Master 6 12%
Researcher 5 10%
Other 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 43%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Psychology 3 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 13 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,552,760
of 18,679,853 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,103
of 11,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,517
of 285,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,679,853 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,843 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.