↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Laser‐assisted in‐situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a mechanical microkeratome compared to LASIK with a femtosecond laser for LASIK in adults with myopia or myopic astigmatism

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
Title
Laser‐assisted in‐situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a mechanical microkeratome compared to LASIK with a femtosecond laser for LASIK in adults with myopia or myopic astigmatism
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012946.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolás Kahuam-López, Alejandro Navas, Carlos Castillo-Salgado, Enrique O Graue-Hernandez, Aida Jimenez-Corona, Antonio Ibarra

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 125 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Master 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 8 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 25 20%
Unknown 54 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 28%
Unspecified 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 60 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,510,086
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,012
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,451
of 400,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#121
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.