↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Nasogastric versus nasojejunal tube feeding for severe acute pancreatitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
Title
Nasogastric versus nasojejunal tube feeding for severe acute pancreatitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010582.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amit Kumar Dutta, Ashish Goel, Richard Kirubakaran, Ashok Chacko, Prathap Tharyan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 194 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 11%
Researcher 14 7%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Other 8 4%
Student > Postgraduate 8 4%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 103 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 113 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,576,910
of 26,245,314 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,946
of 13,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,643
of 396,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#130
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,245,314 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.