↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Nasogastric versus nasojejunal tube feeding for severe acute pancreatitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Nasogastric versus nasojejunal tube feeding for severe acute pancreatitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010582.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amit Kumar Dutta, Ashish Goel, Richard Kirubakaran, Ashok Chacko, Prathap Tharyan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 76 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 5%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 23 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 28 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2020.
All research outputs
#6,021,224
of 18,810,040 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,294
of 11,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,985
of 285,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,810,040 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,863 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.