↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Epidural corticosteroid injections for lumbosacral radicular pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
56 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
228 Mendeley
Title
Epidural corticosteroid injections for lumbosacral radicular pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013577
Pubmed ID
Authors

Crystian B Oliveira, Christopher G Maher, Manuela L Ferreira, Mark J Hancock, Vinicius Cunha Oliveira, Andrew J McLachlan, Bart W Koes, Paulo H Ferreira, Steven P Cohen, Rafael Zambelli Pinto

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 228 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 14%
Other 20 9%
Researcher 16 7%
Student > Bachelor 14 6%
Student > Postgraduate 13 6%
Other 40 18%
Unknown 94 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 103 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2024.
All research outputs
#577,579
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#966
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,677
of 404,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.