↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Epidural corticosteroid injections for lumbosacral radicular pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
53 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Epidural corticosteroid injections for lumbosacral radicular pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013577
Pubmed ID
Authors

Crystian B Oliveira, Christopher G Maher, Manuela L Ferreira, Mark J Hancock, Vinicius Cunha Oliveira, Andrew J McLachlan, Bart W Koes, Paulo H Ferreira, Steven P Cohen, Rafael Zambelli Pinto

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Other 8 9%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 23 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 8%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 28 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2021.
All research outputs
#490,449
of 17,673,294 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,131
of 11,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,370
of 279,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,673,294 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.